Showing posts with label John Lennox God's Undertaker Oxford Sir John Houghton God's science Pope Francis Lumen fidei Fr John Flader. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John Lennox God's Undertaker Oxford Sir John Houghton God's science Pope Francis Lumen fidei Fr John Flader. Show all posts

Friday, July 25, 2014

God can be discovered by the reasonable consideration of His Creation.


 

Exploring Nature to Find God


....
The Bible makes it very clear, as we will soon see, that God can be discovered by the reasonable consideration of His Creation. Medieval Catholic theologians referred to “the Book of Nature,” which they saw as the natural revelation of God standing alongside the supernatural revelation of God in Scripture and Apostolic Tradition. And Vatican I infallibly teaches us that man, using his unaided reason alone, can come to the knowledge of the one, true God.
There are those who see and love God’s wondrous creation, but stop short of seeing God in it. There are even people who worship the created world. Of these, Saint Paul says that they “changed the truth of God into a lie; and worshipped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever” (Rom. 1:25).
But God made his Creation in such a way that we could see Him reflected in its beauties, and He wants us to find Him there. This is how Solomon put it: “For by the greatness of the beauty, and of the creature, the creator of them may be seen, so as to be known thereby” (Wis. 13:5). Saint Paul, agreeing with this testimony, writes, “For the invisible things of him [God], from the creation of the world, are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made; his eternal power also, and divinity” (Rom. 1:20). Saint Paul is being deliberately ironic here when he writes that what is “invisible” in God is “clearly seen” in creation. Our intelligence can see (hear, smell, taste, touch) the visible universe and reason to the existence of God, and even to some of His divine perfections.
This means that plants, animals, rocks, oceans, rivers, clouds, the sky, etc., can teach us about God. In his Confessions, Saint Augustine beholds the marvels of nature, and imagines them telling him, “We are not God, but he made us.” He goes on, “My inner man knew these things through the ministry of the outer man, and I, the inner man, knew all this — I, the soul, through the senses of my body. I asked the whole frame of earth about my God, and it answered, ‘I am not he, but he made me.’”
When we see truth, goodness, and beauty in creation, we see a reflection of the God’s truth, goodness, and beauty. The depth of the ocean, the vastness of space, and the enormity of a whale point us to God’s immensity. A crack of thunder, a flash of lightening, and a storm at sea teach us of God’s might and power. The repeated motion of the heavenly bodies, the cycles of the seasons, and the progress of time point us to God’s eternity. A mother hen brooding over her young shows us a faint glimmer of God’s tenderness. This last is not my image, but was taught us by Our Lord Himself: “Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them that are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered together thy children, as the hen doth gather her chickens under her wings, and thou wouldest not?” (Matt. 23:37).
Is it any wonder that King David, in Psalm 148, invites all of creation — sun, moon, stars, dragons, fire, hail, snow, ice, winds, cattle, serpents, feathered foul, etc. — to join him in praising God? (Crack open your Bible and give that Psalm a read. Better yet, pray it.)
When the Eternal Word through whom all things were made became Incarnate, He taught us in parables. Saint Matthew attributes these words of King David to our Savior: “I will open my mouth in parables, I will utter things hidden from the foundation of the world” (Psalm 77:2, Matthew 13:35). How did Jesus “utter things hidden from the foundation of the world”? In parables that speak of such things as a mustard seed, vineyards, rain, soil, pearls, fish, sheep, birds, the sky, the lilies of the field, herbs, yeast, trees, figs, wine, wheat, and even weeds (called “cockle” or “tares”). He tells us “Now of the fig tree learn ye a parable” (Mark 13:28).
God made a fig tree a teacher!
Jesus would have us explore these creatures of His to discover Himself and His Kingdom — the Catholic Church.
And yes, for all eternity, God knew that His Church would be built on the rock of Saint Peter. When He created rocks, the Divine Mind already knew that the solidity, strength, gravity, and firmness of that noble substance would one day stand for His first Pope and His only Church.
Find, if you can, a grape vine and then read this: “I am the true vine; and my Father is the husbandman. … I am the vine: you the branches: he that abideth in me, and I in him, the same beareth much fruit: for without me you can do nothing. … In this is my Father glorified; that you bring forth very much fruit, and become my disciples” (John 15:1,5,8). From this vine, learn a lesson: God wants you to bear fruit. What fruit? The fruits of good works, the fruits of holiness, the fruits of the Holy Ghost: Charity, Joy, Peace, Patience, Benignity, Goodness, Long-suffering, Mildness, Fidelity, Modesty, Continency, and Chastity.
When you see that vines really have to be “purged” (John 15:2) in order to bear more fruit, you will understand the reality of suffering and mortification better.
Because we can see God in creation, the Catholic imagination has found in plants and animals many diverse symbols of God, Our Lady, the saints, the sacraments, the Christian virtues, and other mysteries of the Faith.

....

Friday, September 20, 2013

Design in nature


....
 
 
 
QUESTION TIME
Printable version
By Fr John Flader
28 July, 2013
I have recently become interested in the question of intelligent design in nature. That is, whether the universe just happened by chance to be the way it is or whether it had to have been designed by a supreme intelligence. Can you shed light on this question?

As you imply in your question, there are only two possible answers to the question. Either the universe just happened by chance, or it was given its form by a creator of supreme intelligence, who can only be God. Atheists, of course, subscribe to the view that everything came about by chance.

But if it did come about by chance we would expect to find only chaos, with random motion of bodies and a random purposeless structure of bodies that could not be comprehended and reduced to simple formulas by the human mind. In short, there would be no universal laws of nature that would give rise to sciences like physics and chemistry.

But in fact we find a structured universe with laws, like the law of gravity, that can be formulated mathematically and which are universally valid. This moved Albert Einstein, arguably the greatest scientist and one of the greatest minds of the twentieth century, to observe: “The most incomprehensible thing about the universe is that it is comprehensible.” He went on to say that he considered this comprehensibility “a miracle” or “an eternal mystery” and it moved him to believe in God: “My religion consists in a humble admiration of the superior unlimited spirit which is revealed in the minimal details which we are able to perceive with our fragile and weak minds. This conviction, deeply emotional, of the presence of a rational superior power which is revealed in the incomprehensible universe, forms my idea of God” (Letters to Solovine, New York 1987, p. 131).

One of St Thomas Aquinas’ five arguments for the existence of God is based precisely on order or purpose in nature. We see this purpose everywhere, especially in living things. The reproductive, digestive and immune systems of animals, es­pecially man, are a classic example. Here everything works together according to an admirable plan.

Archbishop Michael Sheehan, in his popular Apologetics and Catholic Doctrine, explains this argument of St Thomas using the analogy of a camera, which has various parts all working together to produce a photograph. No one would say that the camera put itself together by chance. Yet the human eye is far more complex than a camera. It too must have been put together by an intelligent designer, who can only be God (Baronius Press 2009, pp. 31-33).

Sir Isaac Newton reflects this thinking in his Opticks, written in 1721: “How are the bodies of animals to be contrived with so much art, and for what ends were their natural parts? Was the eye contrived without skill in optics, and the ear without knowledge of sounds? ... Does it not appear from phenomena that there is a Being incorporeal, living, intelligent...?”

Another aspect of nature where we see incredible design is the living cell. Microbiologist Michael Denton, in his book Evolution, a Theory in Crisis, describes the complexity of even the tiniest of bacterial cells, weighing less than a trillionth of a gram, as “a veritable microminiaturised factory containing thousands of exquisitely designed pieces of intricate molecular machinery, made up altogether of 100 thousand million atoms, far more complicated than any machine built by man and absolutely without parallel in the non-living world” (Adler and Adler 1986, pp. 249-250).

Denton goes on to ask: “Is it really credible that random processes could have constructed a reality, the smallest elem­ent of which – a functional protein or gene – is complex beyond our own creative capacities, a reality which is the very antithesis of chance, which excels in every sense anything produced by the intelligence of man?” (ibid.)

The very origin of life, its first appearance in the universe billions of years ago, is another clear argument for design. In the early 1980s, two non-believers, Sir Frederick Hoyle and Chandra Wickramasinghe, set out to calculate the probability of the first living organism putting itself together by chance in the earth’s atmosphere, starting from amino acids. They came up with the infinitessimal probability of one in 1040,000, and concluded that life could not possibly have arisen by chance. Hoyle famously compared the odds against the spontaneous formation of life with the odds of a tornado blowing through a junkyard producing a 747 jet (The Intelligent Universe, London 1983, p. 19). That led him to admit that life indeed needed a creator, whom he called a “super-intellect” in outer space.

So yes, there is evidence for design everywhere in nature. It was God who put it there.

Send your questions to Fr John Flader
c/- The Catholic Weekly
Level 8, Polding Centre,
133 Liverpool St, Sydney 2000

frjflader@gmail.com
fatherfladerblog.wordpress.com